Also, please keep in mind, since those of us doing this thing have dogs, replies and postings may not be as quick as desired. The dogs come first after all! They are our raisons d'être!
- Some comments made to the blog were found by the moderators to be lewd & obscene. Comments that are lewd & obscene will not be posted.
- Comments which indicate a lack of respect for the bloggers, will not be posted.
- Comments that are 'trash talk' will not be posted.
- Comments where every other word is a curse word, will not be posted.
- Comments which are made with either a pseudonym or anonymously will not be posted.
These are the rules by which the moderators will allow posts. Why?
Well, some of the comments that have NOT been approved were: lewd, obscene, and made by people with "potty mouths". The moderators believe that if people cannot support their arguments with logic and good behavior, then those comments need not be posted here. There are other places where you can post them, including the Grey2K blog.
Some of the comments already seen by the moderators were lewd & nasty, and, to tell you the truth, it is what we expect from the AR crowd. They've never been able to support their argument with logic, and they always resort to trash talk, name calling & cursing. They are very adult... NOT! Again, good luck getting them past the moderators!
Some of the comments already seen by the moderators were lewd & nasty, and, to tell you the truth, it is what we expect from the AR crowd. They've never been able to support their argument with logic, and they always resort to trash talk, name calling & cursing. They are very adult... NOT! Again, good luck getting them past the moderators!
You gotta pay to play...
Amen to that! Name-calling and cursing does nothing but prove that there is ZERO substance behind the person's argument. Let's have fact-based, civil-tongued discourse, please. No one respects a bully.
ReplyDelete(Love the neener neener neener pic -- who's the good lookin' yaller dog?)
"Some of the comments already seen by the moderators were lewd & nasty, and, to tell you the truth, it is what we expect from the AR crowd. They've never been able to support their argument with logic, and they always resort to trash talk, name calling & cursing. They are very adult... NOT! Again, good luck getting them past the moderators! "
ReplyDeleteWhoa! That's some weapons grade projection right there. Impressive dude!
Grey2K should be awarded the Bryan Fisher Award as they accuse us of endangering the dogs.
DeleteWell, those of us involved in racing and in the adoption of these wonderful dogs know that you never let a greyhound off leash in an unsafe area, such as on a city street. However, your fearless leader, Christine, has no problem dropping a leash on a city street to spread her propaganda. Staggering hypocrisy!
I do believe, moderators, that the infamous "dropped leash in a parking lot" picture needs to be widely circulated, beginning with a prime spot in this blog. You want to see some "weapons grade" dog-endangerment behavior? Well, there it is. Inexcusable.
ReplyDeleteOK let's see, you got Christine Dorchak dropping a leash. We got Ronnie Earl killing over 30 dogs. Gonna take that trade, if you don't mind.
ReplyDeleteYour comment is incorrect. The man, who was convicted of felony animal abuse and is serving 5 years in prison, is Ron Williams. Yes, he caused the death of 32 greyhounds at Ebro in Florida through willful negligence. And, as far as the moderators of this blog and many, many racing greyhound people are concerned, it isn't punishment enough for the bastard. However, it is the maximum allowed by Florida law.
ReplyDeleteOn the other hand, a greyhound can be just as dead from the willful negligence exhibited by Grey2K's Christine Dorchak. She intentionally dropped a leash on a city street so she could hold up a protest sign. Had her greyhound bolted and been hit by a car, killing it, it would be just as dead as those dogs killed by Ron Williams.
I need to ask, however, if her dog had been killed by her willful negligence, would you treat her the same as you would someone involved or perceived to be involved in racing? My guess is no. She would be given a free ride. More hypocrisy...