By John Murray
A few of weekends ago, someone shot my dogs. One of them was tangled in a string, struggling to get free. This was after they were forced to run 3.5 miles. A few of weeks before that, they were forced to wear muzzles and stuffed in a cramped metal box from which they struggled to get free. When they were finally let out, they had sand forced into their eyes. They were forced to run a little over a mile with sand constantly being forced into their eyes. Will you donate so these dogs don’t have to suffer any more?
Sounds awful, doesn’t it? See how
easy it is to twist things and elicit a guilty, emotional response?
Here’s what really happened:
We went lure coursing a few weekends
ago with my whippets and some people took some fabulous pictures (shot)
of my dogs.
The course they ran on that Saturday was 990 yards (2x
runs per dog), and Tesla ran the 1100 yard course on Sunday 4 times as
she competed in 2 runoffs in addition to her 2 regular runs (total of
6200 yards = ~3.5 miles).
She often grabs the baggy at the end and tugs
relentlessly on the line and baggy to try and break it free so she can
play the “chase me with the toy” game ("tangled in string", struggling
to get free). She actually wasn’t bound up by the string at all.
A few
weeks prior to that we went amateur racing at a greyhound training
facility where we’re occasionally allowed to race our whippets. They
wear muzzles just like the racing greyhounds so that an errant tooth at
the end doesn’t cause some stitches or worse. With only one lure and
high lure drive, the muzzles protect the racers from each other and make
it easier to determine race winners in close races. They’re eager to
chase the lure and when we put them in the starting box, they know the
lure is behind them (they saw it as we walked past) and want nothing
more than to catch it, so they struggle to get out of the starting box
as fast as possible. If a dog isn’t the lead dog, they get sand kicked
up and some gets in the dog’s eyes, which the dog’s body naturally expels
through the tear ducts (sand forced into their eyes). We often rinse
their eyes with saline after each race to help and we rinse their paws
to make sure no sand causes rub spots between their toes/pads etc. They
show a little bit of discomfort, but don’t typically seem extremely
bothered by it. They run 3 races per day of 330 yards each race for a
total of a little over 1 mile for the weekend.
I wrote this to illustrate a point. I hope people take a moment to pause and consider emotionally charged rhetoric and words about greyhound racing, especially if it’s from an organization asking for donations. Context is important in understanding all aspects of a situation and it’s very easy to portray statistics in an emotionally charged way that supports one’s own agenda, as I believe I’ve shown above. Charities, necessarily, have to beg for money and there are a lot of good charities doing wonderful work out there. It’s not my intent to harm the good work these truly beneficial organizations conduct. Unfortunately, there are some (many?) ‘charity’ organizations that will cross any line they legally can to get your donations with no intention of actually helping the cause/dogs/people they claim to support. So I hope if you come across an organization (Grey2k), led by a lawyer (Christine Dorchak) that raises millions of dollars a year but hasn’t actually helped any of the subjects they, Dorchak and her husband, Carey Theil, claim to be helping, I would kindly ask you to ignore those groups and their emotionally charged misinformation. Instead, I would ask you to move along to a more reputable group and source of information. As just one of the many examples of illogical lies being perpetuated, I saw a picture of an anti-racing protester holding a sign claiming 27,000 greyhounds are euthanized a year because they can't race anymore. The National Greyhound Association lists all puppies bred for racing purposes even the ones that are still born and in 2013 there were a little over 10,000 puppies born for racing across the U.S. If nearly 3x the greyhounds born each year are euthanized, how is that remotely sustainable? The NGA claims a 95% adoption rate; we see stories all the time about retired racers being adopted into being used for therapy dogs etc. Which seems more accurate?
I wrote this to illustrate a point. I hope people take a moment to pause and consider emotionally charged rhetoric and words about greyhound racing, especially if it’s from an organization asking for donations. Context is important in understanding all aspects of a situation and it’s very easy to portray statistics in an emotionally charged way that supports one’s own agenda, as I believe I’ve shown above. Charities, necessarily, have to beg for money and there are a lot of good charities doing wonderful work out there. It’s not my intent to harm the good work these truly beneficial organizations conduct. Unfortunately, there are some (many?) ‘charity’ organizations that will cross any line they legally can to get your donations with no intention of actually helping the cause/dogs/people they claim to support. So I hope if you come across an organization (Grey2k), led by a lawyer (Christine Dorchak) that raises millions of dollars a year but hasn’t actually helped any of the subjects they, Dorchak and her husband, Carey Theil, claim to be helping, I would kindly ask you to ignore those groups and their emotionally charged misinformation. Instead, I would ask you to move along to a more reputable group and source of information. As just one of the many examples of illogical lies being perpetuated, I saw a picture of an anti-racing protester holding a sign claiming 27,000 greyhounds are euthanized a year because they can't race anymore. The National Greyhound Association lists all puppies bred for racing purposes even the ones that are still born and in 2013 there were a little over 10,000 puppies born for racing across the U.S. If nearly 3x the greyhounds born each year are euthanized, how is that remotely sustainable? The NGA claims a 95% adoption rate; we see stories all the time about retired racers being adopted into being used for therapy dogs etc. Which seems more accurate?
If possible go see for
yourself what’s really going on with greyhound racing and ask questions
of those directly involved in greyhound racing as it’s being vilified
with lies and deceit by numerous anti-racing interests. Go watch the
wagging tails at the end of each race and tell me with a straight face
they don't love it. I hope you keep an open mind and don't believe the
hype.
It is Christine Dorchak, not Carey that is the lawyer, otherwise great post.
ReplyDeleteThank you! The post has been edited to correct that bit of misinformation.
Delete